I have posted the reference 3 K=11 admixture results for all populations and datasets. Here are the relevant links:
So let's try a dendrogram of all these populations' average admixture results. Instead of using regular Euclidean distance, I used some weighting based on Fst distances between admixture components, very similar to what Palisto did.
Here's a dendrogram of all datasets using complete linkage.
Since the Pan-Asian dataset had only 5,400 SNPs common with reference 3, we need to be careful interpreting the tree above. Just to make sure, here's the dendrogram excluding Pan-Asian populations.
Does the Dendrogram infer that the Kalash have more in common genetically with the Northern Indians? I find it hard to imagine that after centuries of isolation that their makeup is still very comparable to the Northern Indian populations.
I also am pretty surprised with the Bene Israel and Cochin Jews, I would have assumed that the Cochin would be more proportionate to those in the South than in the North.
The Kalash do have a lot in common with the Northwest of the subcontinent.
As for the two Jewish groups, they have partial Jewish and South Asian ancestry which puts them together.
are Sindhi, Pathan and Burusho similar groups.?? its shocking..
Not very similar but as is obvious from another analysis, tey are closer to each other than to most other groups.